Which is deadlier – herbal remedies or conventional medicines?

By | August 13, 2025

Short answer: in absolute numbers, conventional (prescription) medicines account for more deaths—but that’s largely because they’re used by far more people, for more severe illnesses, at higher potencies, and are tracked more rigorously. Herbal remedies aren’t automatically “safer.” Their risks are often under-reported, under-studied, and highly variable (purity, dose, and interactions), so comparing “which is deadlier” isn’t apples to apples.

What we actually know (with caveats)

  • Conventional medicines
    • Classic estimates (e.g., a JAMA meta-analysis by Lazarou et al.) suggested ~100,000 deaths/year in U.S. hospitalized patients from adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Precise modern numbers are hard to pin down, but ADRs remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide.
    • Pharmacovigilance is robust: prescribing is tracked, harms are reported (FDA/EMA), and signals are investigated—so events are more likely to be counted.
  • Herbal/supplement products
    • A 2015 NEJM study estimated ~23,000 U.S. emergency-department visits/year linked to dietary supplements—few were fatal, but many were serious (cardiac stimulants, hepatotoxicity, and supplement misuse).
    • Deaths do occur, often from:
      • Intrinsic toxicity (e.g., aristolochic acid → kidney failure & cancers; comfrey/pyrrolizidine alkaloids → liver failure)
      • Hepatotoxicity (e.g., concentrated green tea extract in some fat-burners; black cohosh in rare cases)
      • Adulteration (herb spiked with undeclared pharmaceuticals)
      • Interactions (e.g., St John’s wort reduces effectiveness of many drugs; ginkgo/garlic/ginseng can increase bleeding with warfarin)
    • Reporting is spotty: many people don’t tell clinicians they use herbs; post-market surveillance is weaker; products vary widely in dose and purity. So true risk is likely underestimated.

How to think about “risk”

  • Absolute risk (population level): conventional meds cause more counted deaths—again, exposure and severity bias.
  • Individual risk: depends on product quality, dose, your conditions, and your other meds. A standardized, tested prescription used correctly may be safer for you than an unstandardized herbal product from an unknown source—and vice versa for low-risk herbal teas versus high-risk prescription opioids. Context matters.

Practical safety tips (for both)

  1. Tell your clinician about every supplement/herb you use (bring the bottles). Interactions are a big deal.
  2. Choose quality: look for third-party certifications (USP, NSF, Informed Choice) for supplements; avoid products making cure-all claims.
  3. Be liver-smart: stop and seek care if you develop fatigue, dark urine, jaundice, right-upper-quadrant pain—common signs of drug/herb-induced liver injury.
  4. Known higher-risk herbs to avoid or use only with medical guidance:
    • Aristolochia (any “aristolochic acid”) – avoid
    • Comfrey, germander, chaparral – hepatotoxic
    • Kava – rare severe liver injury, avoid with liver disease/alcohol
    • Yohimbe, bitter orange/synephrine – stimulatory, cardiac risk
    • St John’s wort – many drug interactions (CYP3A4/P-gp inducer)
  5. Check for interactions with common meds: warfarin, DOACs, transplant meds, HIV meds, chemo, immunosuppressants, antidepressants, and OCPs are frequent conflict zones.
  6. Report problems: in the U.S., use FDA MedWatch for both drugs and supplements.

Bottom line

  • “Natural” ≠ safe, and “conventional” ≠ dangerous.
  • Conventional drugs have higher documented mortality because they’re widely used for serious conditions and are carefully tracked.
  • Herbs can be harmful or fatal too—especially when products are adulterated, misused, or combined with other meds.
  • The safest path is evidence-based use + quality sourcing + interaction checks.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *